World Record in
TCSPC Time Resolution: Combination of bh SPC-150NX with SCONTEL NbN Detector yields
17.8 ps FWHM
Becker, Vladislav Shcheslavskiy, Pavel Morozov
present an ultrafast TCSPC setup consisting of a bh SPC‑150NX TCSPC module
and a SCONTEL superconducting NbN detector. The combination delivers an
instrument response function (IRF) with a full width at half maximum of 17.8 ps.
The RMS value of the overall single-photon timing jitter is about 7.9 ps.
Superconducting single photon detectors
(SSPDs) consist of an ultra-thin superconducting film in the form of a
nanostrip. The strip is normally shaped as a meander [3, 10, 11]. For operation
as an optical detector, the superconducting strip is biased by a DC current
close the critical value. The absorption of a photon results in the formation
of a region with a non-equilibrium concentration of quasiparticles. The current
density then exceeds the critical level, and a resistive region forms across
the nanostrip. The resulting voltage pulse indicates the detection of the
photon. The mechanism is described in detail in . Superconducting NbN
detectors have extremely low timing jitter, and a spectral sensitivity range
from the visible to the mid-IR range. The dark count rate of an SSPD is
extremely low, typically below 1 count per second, and there is no afterpulsing.
The active area of the detectors is on the order of 10 um2.
The SCONTEL SSPD detection system  is
available both in a liquid-He cooled version and with a closed cycle
refrigerator as shown in Fig. 1, left. The spectral sensitivity of two slightly
different detector types is shown on the right.
Fig. 1: Left: SCONTEL superconducting NbN detector, amplifier and
controller unit and closed cycle cooler. Right: Spectral sensitivity curve.
For the experiment we used a SCONTEL TCORPS-UF-10
superconducting NbN detector, both in the liquid-He cooled version and in the
version with a closed-cycle refrigerator . The test light source was an
AVESTA Project EFO-80 laser. The laser emits pulses at a wavelength of 1560 nm
and at a repetition rate of 50 MHz. It has two outputs, one with a pulse width
of 1ps, the other with a pulse width of 300 fs. The 1 ps output was
used to generate a synchronisation signal for the TCSPC device via a fast
photodiode. The 300 fs output was attenuated by a F2A FHA2 series optical
fibre attenuator, and then coupled into the detector. The entire system was
connected by single-mode optical fibres.
The single-photon response pulses from the detector
were amplified by standard low-noise GHz bandwidth RF amplifiers. The total
gain was 40 dB (1:100), resulting in a pulse amplitude of about
200 mV. The amplified pulses were connected to the counting input of a bh
SPC‑150NX TCSPC module. Compared to the commonly used SPC‑150 the
SPC‑150NX has a 4 times higher discriminator bandwidth and 2 times faster
TAC ranges . The minimum time channel width is 405 fs, the electrical
IRF width is 3.6 ps FWHM. The count rates used in the experiments were
between 100 kHz and 2 MHz.
The instrument response function of entire
system, including laser, fibre system, detector, reference photodiode, and
TCSPC device is shown in Fig. 2. The full-width at half maximum (FWHM) of the
IRF is 17.8 ps.
Fig. 2: Instrument-response function of
the detector-TCSPC combination. Left: Linear scale. Right: Logarithmic scale.
Both recorded with bh SPC-150NX TCSPC module, time per channel
405 femtoseconds.spc-150n-06, page 4, 35.8ps /
2 or spc-150n-05, page 3 and 4, 35.6 and 35.8 ps, perfect stability
The logarithmic display shows that the IRF
has a low-amplitude tail of about 2% of the peak amplitude and about
150 ps duration. We do not know whether this is a property of the detector,
a slow tail in the laser pulse shape, or a dispersion effect in the fibre
system. A calculation of the RMS of the effective transit time jitter for
channels with counts more than 1% of the peak value yielded about 7.9 ps.
The timing stability of the detector - TCSPC
combination was excellent. Fig. 3, left, shows two recordings taken with a time
of 5 minutes in between. The curves (blue and red) are almost indistinguishable.
For comparison, Fig. 3, right, shows two recordings with a 30 mm difference
in optical fibre length.
Fig. 3: Left: Two separate recordings, blue
and red, taken with 5 minutes between the measurements. The timing drift is
less <1 ps. Right: Two recordings, 3 cm path length difference
Evaluations of the time resolution of TCSPC
with NbN detectors have been performed and published earlier. Hadfield (2008) states
an IRF width of 68 ps FWHM . Rosenberg et al. (2013) reported a time
resolution of 60 to 80 ps, unfortunately without describing the optics and
the TCSPC setup . Pernice et al. (2012) reached an FWHM of 50 ps with a
TCSPC device of 19 ps RMS timing jitter . Liu et al. (2014) obtained an
IRF width of 75.7 ps FWHM with a multi-mode fibre in front of the detector .
With a single-mode fibre they obtained 52.2 ps FWHM.
An NbN detector of Single Quantum, (The
Netherlands), although specified with 75 ps, delivered 48 ps FWHM
with a bh SPC-150 module. However, the pulse width of the test laser (a
supercontinuum laser with an AOTF) was not accurately known. An extrapolation
of the results for 40 ps laser pulse width yielded an estimate of 25 ps
for the detector alone . Toussaint et al. (2012) reported 35 ps FWHM for
a detector made by Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany . The test
result later improved to 22.2 ps [1, 10]. From these data, the authors
estimated a timing jitter of 19.8 ps FWHM for the detector alone.
Measurements of the timing jitter of SSPD
detectors have also been performed with ultra-fast sampling oscilloscopes. Verevkin
et al. (2004) used an oscilloscope of 50 GHz sampling rate and obtained
18 ps FWHM . In a similar measurement setup, Pernice et al. (2012)
obtained 18 ps FWHM, Schuck et al. (2013) obtained 18.4 ps, and
Tarkhov et al. (2008) 16 ps [4, 6, 8]. It should be noted, however, that
these values are for the detector alone, not for a detector-TCSPC combination.
There is also another significant difference: The oscilloscope calculates
centroid values from the recordings of subsequent pulses, and builds up a histogram
of these values. The TCSPC device directly triggers at the edge of the detector
pulses. The effect of high-frequency noise is different in both cases:
Centroiding partially averages out the noise, edge triggering does not. To our
knowledge, the 17.8 ps FWHM we obtained is the fastest IRF reported for any
detector-TCSPC combination yet.
The question is whether the 17.8 ps we
obtained can be further improved. Theoretical considerations show that the
timing jitter in the buildup of the quasiparticle avalanche may be well below 10 ps FWHM.
The electrical response of the TCSPC module (for noise-free input pulses) is
less than 4 ps FWHM. We therefore believe that the largest part of the
timing uncertainty is induced by electronic noise. Using preamplifiers with
lower noise figure does not significantly improve the situation. Good
amplifiers have a noise figure of less than 2dB. That means the input-referred
noise is only 25 % higher than the thermal noise of the 50-Ohm input
matching resistor. In other words, most of the noise comes from the resistor. The
only way to reduce it is cooling. Resistor noise scales with the square root of
the temperature. Cooling with liquid nitrogen (70K) may therefore reduce the
noise by a factor of two. Normally the entire amplifier has to be cooled because
the matching resistor is part of the amplifier chip. That means only amplifiers
based on MESFETs can be used - bipolar transistors do not work at 70 K.
Another way to improve the resolution would
be to increase the amplitude of the single photon pulse of the detector itself.
However, simply increasing the detector bias current does not help. Above a
certain level, the dark count rate increases steeply [11, 7], and at higher current
superconductivity is lost altogether. It is possible that the amplitude can be
increased by modified detector design but this has not been practically proved
1. W. Becker, The bh TCSPC Handbook, 6th ed., Becker & Hickl GmbH
(2015). Electronic version available on www.becker-hickl.com
2. R. H. Hadfield, Single-photon detectors for optical quantum information
applications. Nature Photonics 3, 696-705 (2009)
3. D.Liu, S.Miki, T.Yamashita, L.You, Z.Wang, H.Terai, Multimode
fiber-coupled superconducting nanowire single-photon detector with 70% system
efficiency at visible wavelength. Opt. Exp. 22, 21167-21174 (2014)
4. W.H.P. Pernice, C. Schuck, O. Minaeva, M. Li, G.N. Goltsman, A.V.
Sergienko, H.X. Tang, High-speed and high-efficiency travelling wave single-photon
detectors embedded in nanophotonic circuits. Nature Communications 3, 1325-1335
5. D. Rosenberg, A. J. Kerman, R. J. Molnar, and E. A. Dauler, High-speed
and high-efficiency superconducting nanowire single photon detector array. Opt.
Expr. 21, 1440-1447 (2013)
6. C. Schuck, W.H. P. Pernice, O.Minaeva, M.Li, G.Goltsman, A.V.
Sergienko, H X. Tang, Matrix of integrated superconducting single-photon
detectors with high timing resolution. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 23 2201007
7. SCONTEL Superconducting Nanotechnology, http://www.scontel.ru/sspd
8. M. Tarkhov, J. Claudon, J. Ph. Poizat,2, A. Korneev, A. Divochiy, O.
Minaeva, V. Seleznev, N. Kaurova, B. Voronov, A. V. Semenov, G. Goltsman, Ultrafast
reset time of superconducting single photon detectors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92,
241112-1 to -3 (2008)
9. J. Tousaint, R. Grüner, M. Schubert, T. May, H.-G. Meyer, B.
Dietzek, J. Popp, M. Hofherr, M. Arndt, D. Henrich, K. Ilin, M. Siegel,
Superconductiong single-photon counting system for optical experiments requiring
time-resolution in the picosecond range. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 123103-1 to -5 (2012)
10. J. Toussaint, S. Dochow, I. Latka, A. Lukic, T. May, H.-G. Meyer, K.
Ilin, M. Siegel, J. Popp, Proof of concept of fiber dispersed Raman spectroscopy
using superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Opt. Expr. 23,
11. A. Verevkin, A. Pearlman, W. Slysz, J. Zhang, M. Currie, A. Korneev,
G. Chulkova, O. Okunev, P. Kouminov, K, Smirnov, B. Voronov, G. Goltsman, R.
Sobolewski, Untrafast superconducting single-photon detectors for
near-infrared-wavelength quantum communications. J. Mod. Op. 51, 1447-1458
Wolfgang Becker Pavel
Becker & Hickl GmbH SCONTEL
Berlin, Germany Moscow,